Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014
Johnson and Onwuegbuzie discuss mixed methods research as well as quantitative and qualitative studies. It shows the advantages and disadvantages of both approaches and that when one method is not fully successful, they can be combined. The authors focus on the research problem and are not restricting themselves to only one strategy. They also explain that the combination of methods should depend on the research question.
The authors compare quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods to demonstrate how the strengths of one approach may help determine the faults of others. The article is beneficial for understanding why mixed methods are used and provides a useful comparison of different approaches. However, the article relies on thoughts and ideas rather than factual information. It shows the value and basis of mixed methods more than the procedures.
This article is important because our recent discussions show the difficulties of studying education with only one perspective. Quantitative research helps pinpoint patterns and outcomes using measurements and data, while qualitative research assists with understanding the process and characteristics of those numbers. This relates to educational technology research because these different methods can determine a student’s performance and technology use, or gather information on their experience with technology. This article helps me see that these research methods can be combined and applied together to discover necessary answers while providing a deeper understanding.
Leave a Reply